Letter: Unfair criticism of Dan

Posted 4/12/17

Are any of the charges in recent letters to the editor critical of Jeffco's ex-Superintendent Dan McMinimee true?

Do these letter writers not know that every chief executive serving …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Username
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution in 2022-2023 of $50 or more, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Letter: Unfair criticism of Dan

Posted

Are any of the charges in recent letters to the editor critical of Jeffco's ex-Superintendent Dan McMinimee true?

Do these letter writers not know that every chief executive serving under a Board of Directors, public or corporate, is obligated to follow its directions?

Was Dan ever charged by the present Teachers'-Union-installed School Board with any deficiency, much less insubordination? 

Is not the interim-Superintendent silently following exactly those same orders from the present Board, with respect to school closures, financial shuffling, mass sixth grade forced-migrations, plus program cuts and their subsequent restorations?

So how can they then be McMinimees' faults? 

Do not these letter writers owe Dan McMinimee an apology?

Russ Haas,

Golden

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.