District Attorney Carol Chambers has always been controversial — even before she took office as a first-term chief prosecutor in the 18th Judicial …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
If you made a voluntary contribution in 2020-2021, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access includes access to all websites and online content.
District Attorney Carol Chambers has always been controversial —
even before she took office as a first-term chief prosecutor in the
18th Judicial District.
Her tough-as-nails image has rankled critics from the beginning,
but Chambers’ supporters argue passionately that her successes as a
prosecutor have made the district — which includes Arapahoe,
Douglas, Elbert and Lincoln counties — a far safer community.
Attorney Frank Azar, best known for his local TV commercials,
went so far as to bankroll a $60,000 campaign to promote Chambers’s
reelection bid through a political-action committee called People
for Victims Rights.
Last year, Chambers was hailed in many quarters when she became
the first district attorney in the state to win a first-degree
murder verdict in a road-rage case.
Supporters have also praised Chambers for her increased use of
habitual-criminal statutes against repeat offenders, though critics
say the prosecutor has been overzealous in effectively imposing
life sentences on low-level or nonviolent offenders.
In a controversial move, Chambers has routinely billed the state
Department of Corrections to prosecute murders that occurred in
state prisons — even billing the state for the $131,000 salary of a
While the billing is legal, some have questioned the wisdom of
seeking the notoriously expensive death penalty for
inmate-on-inmate homicides and charging the taxpayers in a state
that seldom executes anyone.
Chambers has been on the opposite side of the courtroom too. The
Republican was the first district attorney in 16 years to receive
public censure from the Colorado Supreme Court’s Attorney
Regulation Counsel after she intervened in a civil collections case
on behalf of a fellow GOP activist.
In less than four years, Chambers’ self-styled history has run
the gamut — from bluntly challenging her own salary in a letter to
county commissioners to being removed from a death-penalty case
after a judge ruled her office had violated conduct rules.
The district attorney has also been accused — and cleared — of
trying to intimidate a judge and an attorney and caused
consternation when she conducted an informal survey on how Arapahoe
County judges were spending court time.
In May, former Jefferson County prosecutor George Brauchler
announced he would launch a dark-horse Republican primary challenge
against Chambers, citing the incumbent’s arguably divisive
Brauchler’s candidacy was initially written off by party
activists who backed the sitting district attorney at a party
assembly, but the challenger has since received the endorsements of
five law enforcement fraternal organizations and two police
Chambers does not accept formal endorsements, citing a perceived
conflict of interest.
In the face of controversy and political battles, Chambers has
exuded self-assurance. But the prosecutor’s sense of humor can be
just as disarming.
She comically mugs for the camera during a newspaper photo
shoot. When asked to name her greatest weakness, she replies with a
chuckle, “Men with tattoos.”
On the eve of the Aug. 12 primary that may decide the election
in the GOP-dominated 18th District, Colorado Community Newspapers
sat down with Chambers for a broad-ranging, one-on-one
CCN: Was it a given that you would seek a second term?
Chambers: I don’t think I ever stopped and thought about it, but
there’s more I want to do.
We’re in the process now of starting a mental-health court. It
would be the first in the state of Colorado.
There are people in the criminal-justice system because of their
mental illness. This takes those people out of jail, which is a
very expensive — when their issues could be addressed by therapy,
structured supervision and therapeutical medical intervention. It’s
CCN: In your pre-law days, you were a nurse and interacted with
mental-health patients and crime victims. How did that experience
shape you as a prosecutor?
Chambers: It helped me see the acute anguish of being a victim
or having your lover jump off the Blue Cross Blue Shield building.
I think the experience showed me the human side. That tends to be
the problem with prosecutors. We don’t interact with the human
beings. We interact with their attorneys.
CCN: Since taking office in 2005, you have lost what your
critics say is an unprecedented 50 percent of your original staff
of attorneys. Why?
Chambers: It appears to be something it’s not. Once I won the
primary, there was such vicious animosity in this office, those
people had to leave. That’s to be expected whenever there’s an
unpleasant, ugly election.
Then, amongst some very experienced attorneys, we’ve had a few
people go, but that’s nothing extraordinary.
I tried to hire people who had some life experience so that when
they were across the table from a defendant, they had some sense of
what they were dealing with. A lot of those people were actually
very liberal and had a hard time with being prosecutors,
CCN: Are you saying liberals don’t make very good
Chambers: No, I’m saying some of them ended up being fairly
uncomfortable with the process.
Then, we had some people with health issues. And we have fairly
high standards and the load is extreme. It’s not a job for
CCN: Your reconstituted staff successfully prosecuted the
state’s first and only first-degree murder conviction for road
rage. Many people were surprised because road rage, almost by
definition, is not a premeditated crime.
Chambers: This was so aggravated and so habitual for this
particular defendant. He had performed the same maneuver on a
police car. But also his attitude — he had killed two people, got
out of his car and looked at the carnage and said, “Well, I feel
sorry for that guy, but this guy deserved it.”
CCN: You have a reputation for being tough on crime — tough to a
fault, according to some. How do you feel when you hear words like
“firebrand” and “lightning-rod” prosecutor used to describe your
Chambers: I laugh. I understand that I have done some things
that other prosecutors may not have done in the past. But I don’t
know why. I have clearly stepped on some very powerful toes, but it
was never my intent to cause them any kind of turmoil. It was my
intent to make the system better.
CCN: Any regrets?
Chambers: My interactions [over my salary] with the county
commissioners. They’re delightful people. At the time, I wanted to
make sure that our relationship was not going to be hampered by
political bad feelings. At this point, I have a great working
relationship with them.
CCN: You have clashed with others too. Your GOP challenger has
said you are more centered on controversy than on building strong
relationships in the law enforcement, legal and judicial
Chambers: He’s only been a prosecutor for 12 years. He has never
been part of a management team in an office. I think he’s trying to
take advantage of the controversy in the last four years.
CCN: Are you worried?
Chambers: No. If I’m not doing this, I’ll be doing some other
adventure. When I took the job, I said I’m going to do what I think
is in the best interest of the people, and that’s what I’ve
CCN: Your are known for having an almost unwavering sense of
self-confidence — especially in situations where you’ve been called
on the carpet. Do you think people are reading you accurately?
Chambers: I make thoughtful and considered decisions. So once I
make a decision, I am confident about it. If they’re controversial
decisions, I’m willing to accept the controversy. I don’t act until
I have the counsel I need.
For example, when I make a determination about the death
penalty, I gather our chief deputy DAs and senior DAs and we really
look at the case in great detail. But I am not reticent to review
my decisions either.
CCN: You have remained steadfast in ardently defending the
actions that resulted in your censure. You were accused of
violating conduct rules by intervening in a civil matter and
threatening to call a grand jury to investigate a collections
Chambers: One of the reasons I brought up the grand jury to him
was because I wasn’t sure he’d call me back if I didn’t.
CCN: A bluff?
Chambers: No, it wasn’t a bluff. It was “I want to investigate
this and I want you to call me back and tell me your side of the
I think I’ve learned since then that my voice perhaps carries
more power than I realized at the time. One of the questions was,
why didn’t I let somebody else do it? That’s a distinction without
a difference. Having been a nurse cleaning up human discharge, when
you see something, you just do it.
CCN: You are the most powerful prosecutor in four counties. You
didn’t realize the weight that a phone call from you would
Chambers: Being the DA is powerful. But when people describe my
husband [Nathan Chambers, former chair of the Arapahoe County
Republican Party] and I as a “power couple,” that just makes me
laugh. I can’t do anything independent of the law and I can’t do
anything unless I follow the law. There are so many procedures and
safeguards that protect anybody from abusing this power.
But I learned that perhaps I need to speak more softly than I
would have as a chief deputy.
CCN: When you were ordered to pay court costs, the taxpayers
paid and also footed your legal bill. Why was that appropriate?
Chambers: Because I was doing my job.
CCN: But this was a civil matter. As a district attorney, you
prosecute criminal cases.
Chambers: If it had been a normal criminal matter, absolutely.
This collections attorney was bullying this victim of identity
theft to the point that he was extorting a victim to pay a check he
knows she does not owe. I believe I was doing my job in advocating
on behalf of a victim of identity theft.
CCN: Six of the seven recent death-penalty cases in Colorado
were or are being prosecuted in your district. Half are for murders
that occurred in prisons. Since only one person in the state has
been executed in 40 years, is it a prudent to pursue so many
expensive capital cases when few, if any, are likely to result in
Chambers: There’s an economy of scale so there are certain
things that will bring the price down.
I’m also not sure that other jurisdictions have had the same
kinds of crimes that we have. To have somebody dragged to death and
die from loss of skin has not happened in any other jurisdiction in
the state that I know of.
Seeking the death penalty for a prison murder makes everyone
else in the prison safer. If you have a prison where the prisoners
assume nobody cares what they do to each other, you have an
increased level of violence.
One of the reasons I can prosecute death-penalty cases is
because I have taken away several layers of management. We used to
have experienced attorneys sitting behind desks and not in the
CCN: You’ve also taken heat for your frequent filing of
habitual-criminal charges against nonviolent offenders, including
halfway house walkaways. Such charges can triple or quadruple the
maximum sentence for a repeat offender.
Chambers: The past is the best predictor of the future. Just
because we’re charging them with habitual-criminal cases does not
mean that we’re not plea bargaining those cases.
Plus, the defense bar is getting this message out to their
clients: If you are a repeat offender in this jurisdiction, you
will be treated more harshly. So of you don’t want to be treated
more harshly, don’t come here and commit your crimes.
If you are given the benefit of community corrections, you need
to stay where the judge has told you to stay. Walkaways were
initially down 85 percent.
Now, if a repeat offender’s prior three felonies are, for
example, addiction, ID theft and distribution, I have told my
people that it’s OK to do a treatment program and give them a
suspended sentence as a motivator to finish it.
But by the same token, we see people with 10 and 12 felonies
who, prior to my administration, were not being treated as repeat
offenders. I think it’s unreasonable to explain to Victim No. 13
why that person has not been dealt with a little bit more
Other items that may interest you
We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.
The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.