'Tasting rooms' plan for pot shops vetoed by governor

Hickenlooper cites fears that proposal could have led to more impaired driving

Associated Press
Posted 6/7/18

Colorado's governor has vetoed a bill to allow marijuana retailers to set up “tasting rooms,” dashing hopes that the state would be the first to adopt a system letting consumers use marijuana …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you made a voluntary contribution of $25 or more in Nov. 2017-2018, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

'Tasting rooms' plan for pot shops vetoed by governor

Hickenlooper cites fears that proposal could have led to more impaired driving

Posted

Colorado's governor has vetoed a bill to allow marijuana retailers to set up “tasting rooms,” dashing hopes that the state would be the first to adopt a system letting consumers use marijuana in public spaces.

Gov. John Hickenlooper has objected to similar bills in the past, arguing it could prompt a federal crackdown. He stayed quiet on the issue during the legislative session this year but wasn't satisfied with the scaled-back proposal. In a letter explaining the veto, Hickelooper wrote that the bill could have resulted in more impaired drivers on Colorado's roads and other public health risks.

“We may agree with the proponents' goals to protect the public and children; however, we strongly disagree that this bill is the correct path to achieve those goals,” he wrote.

This year's proposal dramatically scaled back some advocates' ambitions for stand-alone businesses reminiscent of a neighborhood bar or an upscale club where marijuana products would replace alcohol. The bill would not have allowed smoking of marijuana in the establishments — vaping and edible products would have been permitted instead — and it also would have let local municipalities decide whether to allow the so-called “tasting rooms.”

But some lawmakers publicly worried that step could draw the attention of federal authorities, including Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Supporters hoped the narrow bill could resolve a stubborn conflict in Colorado and other states with legal marijuana.

Marijuana possession by adults is legal but using it in public, including streets, parks and most hotels or rental properties, could lead to a citation.

Other states have repeatedly delayed or avoided a statewide system for public use, including Alaska, where regulators are expected to resume discussions this month on letting people consume inside retail stores.

A voter-backed initiative forced Denver regulators into allowing so-called “social consumption facilities” where customers bring their own marijuana. But state and local regulators' tight controls on business models and permitted locations have limited interest. City officials have issued only one permit and received only two applications since August.

Officials in the Las Vegas area have delayed action on a similar type of license, waiting to see how Denver's system would work. In California, San Francisco is the only city to permit lounges where people can smoke and use other marijuana products, while other cities are considering the idea.

Advocates blasted Hickenlooper's veto, arguing that it will allow unregulated indoor clubs to continue operating without legal authority.

“In its wisdom, the Colorado Legislature sought to close a significant gap in regulation,” said Chris Woods, the owner of Terrapin Care Station, a company selling both medical and recreational marijuana in multiple Front Range locations. “It's unfortunate that the governor chose not to offer another regulatory tool to state and local regulators. This fight is not over.”

Comments

Our Papers

Ad blocker detected

We have noticed you are using an ad blocking plugin in your browser.

The revenue we receive from our advertisers helps make this site possible. We request you whitelist our site.